Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) has had a significant impact in academic publishing. As we all try to come to grips with a phenomenon that has taken the world by storm, some researchers have even tried to list ChatGPT as their co-author.
AI should be used to enhance, not compromise, the integrity and reproducibility of research findings, with a strong emphasis on transparency and human accountability...
Numerous policies and guidelines have been put into place. If you are thinking of publishing, please read the author guidelines for each publisher very carefully.
The Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) issued a statement on authorship and AI, affirming their belief that AI cannot be considered an author of a publication...
Whether publishing, reviewing or editing, it is essential to check the publisher’s policies on AI use. For example, Elsevier Publishing Ethics (policies on AI use can be found under Duties of Editors, Duties of Reviewers, and Duties of Authors).
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in scientific writing...
The use of generative AI and AI-assisted tools in figures, images and artwork...
More information can be found on this page from the Elsevier website at https://www.elsevier.com/about/policies-and-standards/publishing-ethics#3-duties-of-reviewers
AI can assist in processing large datasets, identifying patterns, and generating visualisations that help researchers interpret their data more effectively. To ensure data integrity and transparency, it is crucial to...
When you are making plans to implement AI in your research, you should ensure that it is included in your data management plan (DMP) - see the SIT LibGuide Research Data Management. This helps in effectively handling your data and maintaining transparency in how the AI is used and its impact on the research process.